Wednesday, November 19, 2008

More gay "tolerance"

Please take time to read Michelle Malkin's short but excellent post on the "insane rage" by gay rights activists. She writes:
But when the GOP took a beating on Nov. 4, no mass protests ensued. No nationwide boycotts erupted. Conservatives took their lumps and began the peaceful post-defeat process of self-flagellation, self-analysis, and self-autopsy. In fact, there’s only one angry mob gripped by “insane rage” in the wake of campaign 2008: The mob of left-wing, same-sex marriage activists incensed at their defeat in California. Voters there approved a traditional marriage initiative, Proposition 8, by 52-48.

Read Michelle's post for a description of the intimidation, harrassment, threats and violence being used by gay rights activists.

The true colors of the radical gay rights movement is really starting to shine through. All their talk of tolerance was a sham. It was nothing more than a ruse to get the "camel's nose" into the tent. Some of these people (again, not all gays) are among the most intolerant people on the planet.

If the situation were reversed, that is, if conservative Christians were using these tactics against gays, the story would be shown and discussed night after night after night on every TV news program in the country! As it is, the media is virtually silent.

3 comments:

professor ed said...

I wonder how many of these "enlightened" narrow minds like to wear brown shirts. It would certainly be most fitting.

Dennis said...

I agree. What is most disturbing about it is that as far as I know, none of this intolerance has been condemned by major gay rights organizations.

mnotaro said...

I am shocked to see such hatred and frightening, malicious anger from a group of people who want to be treated just like everyone else and who just want to be accepted and don't want to be discriminated against...but isn't that what they are doing to the Prop 8 supporters? The liberal illuminati are all about civil rights--only when it fits in with their agenda, and if it doesn't then the right to have an opinion is apparently not allowed to be heard?!!!